Bug#659861: Processed: your mail

2013-04-09 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: notfound -1 1:1.12.13-12+squeeze1 On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 17:16:47 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Control: fixed -1 1:1.12.13-12+squeeze1 > It's closed, but marked as still affecting the version in stable. > I think the above should fix that. Nope, I guess this one should do, though: <

Bug#659861: Processed: your mail

2013-04-05 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: fixed -1 1:1.12.13-12+squeeze1 On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 14:15:33 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Adam D. Barratt dixit: > > I don't think you can (in either case). You can mark a bug as found / fixed > > in > > a binary version, but the BTS will translate that to the corresponding > > sour

Bug#659861: Processed: your mail

2013-03-31 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Adam D. Barratt dixit: > I don't think you can (in either case). You can mark a bug as found / fixed in > a binary version, but the BTS will translate that to the corresponding source > version. Similarly bug versions apply to the package, not to particular > architectures. Hrm. > I think the cl

Bug#659861: Processed: your mail

2013-03-31 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 31.03.2013 00:17, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Adam D. Barratt dixit: In which case it should probably be closed, as it doesn't apply to any current package in the archive and no changes in the package are required to resolve it. OK. Hrm. How do I tell the BTS’ version tracking that it’s fixe

Bug#659861: Processed: your mail

2013-03-30 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Adam D. Barratt dixit: > In which case it should probably be closed, as it doesn't apply to any current > package in the archive and no changes in the package are required to resolve > it. OK. Hrm. How do I tell the BTS’ version tracking that it’s fixed in 1:1.12.13-12+squeeze1+b1 on amd64 and n

Bug#659861: Processed: your mail

2013-03-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 - squeeze-ignore On 30.03.2013 22:59, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Adam D. Barratt dixit: tags 659861 + squeeze-ignore Apologies if I missed the discussion, but was that agreed with anyone on the release team? It’s just not a bug in the package but a bug in the build environme

Bug#659861: Processed: your mail

2013-03-30 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Adam D. Barratt dixit: >>> tags 659861 + squeeze-ignore > Apologies if I missed the discussion, but was that agreed with anyone on the > release team? It’s just not a bug in the package but a bug in the build environment of the person who did the last upload (which was subsequently fixed by a bi

Bug#659861: Processed: your mail

2013-03-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 30.03.2013 17:03, ow...@bugs.debian.org wrote: Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 659861 + squeeze-ignore Bug #659861 [cvs] cvs contains /usr/share/info/dir.gz Bug #664872 [cvs] cvs: Excess dir.gz file in /usr/share/info Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore. Added tag(s) squeeze-i