On 03.03.2012 16:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
out of date on kfreebsd-amd64: libcam0, libsbuf0, libsbuf0-udeb,
libusb2, libusb2-udeb, libusbhid4 (from 8.3~svn229725-3)
out of date on kfreebsd-i386: libcam0, libsbuf0, libsbuf0-udeb,
libusb2, libusb2-udeb, libusbhid4 (from 8.3~svn229725-3)
T
El 4 de març de 2012 13:16, Adam D. Barratt
ha escrit:
> On 03.03.2012 16:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>
>> out of date on kfreebsd-amd64: libcam0, libsbuf0, libsbuf0-udeb,
>> libusb2, libusb2-udeb, libusbhid4 (from 8.3~svn229725-3)
>> out of date on kfreebsd-i386: libcam0, libsbuf0, libsbuf0
Robert Millan (03/03/2012):
> AFAICS the only remaining issues are:
>
> freebsd-buildutils is only 8 days old. It must be 10 days old to go in.
> kfreebsd-kernel-headers is only 4 days old. It must be 10 days old
> to go in.
>
> Instead of waiting one more week, perhaps it'd make sense t
On 03.03.2012 16:07, Robert Millan wrote:
AFAICS the only remaining issues are:
freebsd-buildutils is only 8 days old. It must be 10 days old to
go in.
kfreebsd-kernel-headers is only 4 days old. It must be 10 days
old
to go in.
Well, there's also freebsd-utils (5/10 days) and:
El 28 de febrer de 2012 22:07, Adam D. Barratt
ha escrit:
> The packages which have not been successfully rebuilt thus far are:
>
> - cdparanoia - maintainers, are there plans for an upload to resolve
> #660403? If not, would you be averse to an NMU purely containing the
> updated kBSD patch?
>
>
El 28 de febrer de 2012 22:07, Adam D. Barratt
ha escrit:
> On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 11:08 +, Robert Millan wrote:
>> Btw, would a new freebsd-libs upload disrupt anything? A fix for
>> #661274 is required, although this isn't a transition blocker AFAICT.
>
> That rather depends on [...]
No worr
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 11:08 +, Robert Millan wrote:
> Btw, would a new freebsd-libs upload disrupt anything? A fix for
> #661274 is required, although this isn't a transition blocker AFAICT.
That rather depends on how long we think it's likely to take to get the
rest of the transition done, an
Btw, would a new freebsd-libs upload disrupt anything? A fix for
#661274 is required, although this isn't a transition blocker AFAICT.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi
El 25 de febrer de 2012 13:46, Adam D. Barratt
ha escrit:
>> 660397: qpxtool: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*
>> 660401: dvd+rw-tools: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*
>> -> (eglibc bug) Tagged pending by maintainer since 20th Feb. Should it
>> be NMUed? CCing maintainer.
>
> That's still less than a week. Aurelien, are
Hi,
I figured it'd be useful to send a status update to summarize on
what's done and what's missing:
659615: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64
-> Fixed by maintainer since 15th Feb.
660395: xserver-xorg-input-joystick: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*
-> Fixed in NMU since 19th Feb.
660398: k3b: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*
6
On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 12:20 +, Robert Millan wrote:
> 660403: cdparanoia: FTFBS on kfreebsd-*
> -> Unless there's further activity I recommend removing of kfreebsd-*
> binaries from testing. See
> http://bugs.debian.org./cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660403#12
That doesn't work. The choices would
11 matches
Mail list logo
