Bug#660111: multiple, non-physically accesible, HDMI devices (Re: pulseaudio: pa can't handle multiple HDMI devices)

2012-09-28 Thread Andres Cimmarusti
You're correct; even if the information is there, it isn't advertised in pavucontrol. I should probably implement that... (If you're using Ubuntu 12.04, you will have a new sound settings UI that hides unavailable devices. For upstreaming of this UI please see the gnome-cc list.) What

Bug#660111: multiple, non-physically accesible, HDMI devices (Re: pulseaudio: pa can't handle multiple HDMI devices)

2012-06-10 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Ben Hutchings wrote: Do we still need to make kernel changes for wheezy, or does the new PA together with the current kernel package (version 3.2.19-1) avoid this problem? I think Andres mentioned some patches that expose detected jack status using kcontrols. Andres, do you know of relevant

Bug#660111: multiple, non-physically accesible, HDMI devices (Re: pulseaudio: pa can't handle multiple HDMI devices)

2012-06-10 Thread Andres Cimmarusti
Andres, do you know of relevant commit ids?  Can you describe the difference in behavior between 3.2.19-1 and 3.4.1-1~experimental.1 and whether it's worth backporting these changes? I will try the kernel from experimental and let you know if the changes are worth while. Unfortunately I have

Bug#660111: multiple, non-physically accesible, HDMI devices (Re: pulseaudio: pa can't handle multiple HDMI devices)

2012-06-10 Thread Andres Cimmarusti
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Andres Cimmarusti acimmaru...@gmail.com wrote: Andres, do you know of relevant commit ids?  Can you describe the difference in behavior between 3.2.19-1 and 3.4.1-1~experimental.1 and whether it's worth backporting these changes? I will try the kernel from

Bug#660111: multiple, non-physically accesible, HDMI devices (Re: pulseaudio: pa can't handle multiple HDMI devices)

2012-06-10 Thread David Henningsson
On 06/11/2012 02:40 AM, Andres Cimmarusti wrote: On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Andres Cimmarusti acimmaru...@gmail.com wrote: Andres, do you know of relevant commit ids? Can you describe the difference in behavior between 3.2.19-1 and 3.4.1-1~experimental.1 and whether it's worth