On 03/02/2012 03:42 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> tags 661850 + patch
> thanks
>
> On 02.03.2012 03:31, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> On 02.03.2012 02:52, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> As a side note: I've also tested 1.11.2, which worked nicely.
>>> So it looks like the regression happened between .2 and .3
>>
Hi.
On 03/02/2012 03:42 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> tags 661850 + patch
> thanks
>
> On 02.03.2012 03:31, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> On 02.03.2012 02:52, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> As a side note: I've also tested 1.11.2, which worked nicely.
>>> So it looks like the regression happened between .2 and
tags 661850 + patch
thanks
On 02.03.2012 03:31, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 02.03.2012 02:52, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> As a side note: I've also tested 1.11.2, which worked nicely.
>> So it looks like the regression happened between .2 and .3
>
> I did a git bisect run, and the first faulty commit i
On 02.03.2012 02:52, Michael Biebl wrote:
> As a side note: I've also tested 1.11.2, which worked nicely.
> So it looks like the regression happened between .2 and .3
I did a git bisect run, and the first faulty commit is
commit 12dc0ec5e3c7e1a12569d5cfdbb8ceaa5a5f5f58
Author: Stefano Lattarini
On 02.03.2012 01:22, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> I built systemd with -j6 and it reliably fails with automake 1:1.11.3-1.
>> Building with automake 1:1.11.1-1 reliably works.
>>
>> I've cloned the bug and reassigned the copy to automake. I decided to
>> keep the RC severity, as this breaks packages whi
Am 01.03.2012 22:29, schrieb Michael Biebl:
> clone 661842 -1
> reassign -1 automake
> found -1 1:1.11.3-1
> retitle -1 vala build rules not parallel safe
> thanks
>
>> Package: systemd
>> Version: 37-1
>> Severity: serious
>>
>> The latest round of binNMUs for systemd [1] failed due to the usage
6 matches
Mail list logo
