Bug#665458: Another grave bug of tex-common leeding to uninstallable package

2012-03-25 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message Am So den 25. Mär 2012 um 1:53 schrieb Norbert Preining: reassign 665458 jadetex severity 665458 important retitle 665458 missing dep on texlive-generic-recommended (for ulem.sty) thanks

Bug#665458: Another grave bug of tex-common leeding to uninstallable package

2012-03-25 Thread Norbert Preining
tags 665458 + unreproducible thanks On So, 25 MÀr 2012, Klaus Ethgen wrote: Grave is not installable. So this bug is a grave bug, fullstop! Read the description in reportbug: 2 grave makes the package in question unusable by most or all users, or causes data loss, or

Bug#665458: Another grave bug of tex-common leeding to uninstallable package

2012-03-25 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message Am So den 25. Mär 2012 um 9:54 schrieb Norbert Preining: Discussion about severity finished. fullstop. As I told, play your childish severity game alone. uninstallable means unusable in my

Bug#665458: Another grave bug of tex-common leeding to uninstallable package

2012-03-25 Thread Norbert Preining
On So, 25 MÀr 2012, Klaus Ethgen wrote: YOu reported against tex-common. And even against jadetex I cannot reproduce this behaviour, not even in a minimal chroot with only those packages I mentioned installed ... Yes. The bug happens with tex-common. If it is jadetex, feel free to

Bug#665458: Another grave bug of tex-common leeding to uninstallable package

2012-03-25 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message Hi, everything is fine now with jadetex (3.13-14) and tex-common (3.5). Thanks. Regards Klaus -- Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/ pub 4096R/4E20AF1C

Bug#665458: Another grave bug of tex-common leeding to uninstallable package

2012-03-25 Thread Norbert Preining
On So, 25 MÀr 2012, Klaus Ethgen wrote: everything is fine now with jadetex (3.13-14) and tex-common (3.5). Good, thanks. Norbert Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org} JAIST, Japan

Bug#665458: Another grave bug of tex-common leeding to uninstallable package

2012-03-24 Thread Norbert Preining
reassign 665458 jadetex severity 665458 important retitle 665458 missing dep on texlive-generic-recommended (for ulem.sty) thanks On Sa, 24 MÀr 2012, Klaus Ethgen wrote: As I mention on the bug before there is another grave bug holding the What is grave? ! LaTeX Error: File `ulem.sty' not

Bug#665458: Another grave bug of tex-common leeding to uninstallable package

2012-03-24 Thread Norbert Preining
On So, 25 MÀr 2012, Norbert Preining wrote: ! LaTeX Error: File `ulem.sty' not found. Reading the error you can see an easy way to fix it, search for ulem.sty in the package repository and install the resp package: apt-get install texlive-generic-recommended Fixed in jadetex 3.13-14,