Package: fso-frameworkd
Version: 0.9.5.9+git20110512-3
Severity: normal

Hi,

fso-frameworkd{,-gta0{1,2}} are arch:all, but their dependencies only
exist on armel; would it make more sense for the packages to also be
arch:armel?

One practical consequence of the current setup is that britney refuses
to migrate the packages without a large hammer being applied as doing so
would make the packages uninstallable on i386, the only architecture on
which arch:all packages are installability checked.

Regards,

Adam




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to