On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 01:56 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 05.04.2012 18:24, Svante Signell wrote:
[]
Thank you for a prompt feedback. Network speed is now 1.7 Mbps (not as
large as 2.6 Mbps but much better than 0.3 Mbps) but I'm testing this
remotely. Have to have physical access to the
On 05.04.2012 18:24, Svante Signell wrote:
[]
Thank you for a prompt feedback. Network speed is now 1.7 Mbps (not as
large as 2.6 Mbps but much better than 0.3 Mbps) but I'm testing this
remotely. Have to have physical access to the host to find out the real
Did you have a chance to test
Package: qemu-kvm
Version: 1.0+dfsg-2
Severity: important
Hello,
With recent qemu-kvm versions (don't know since when) network speed
slows down from 2.6 Mbps to less than 300 kbps with GNU/Linux as host
and GNU/Hurd as guest, using the -vnc :n option. Without this option
network speed is OK,
On 05.04.2012 13:25, Svante Signell wrote:
Package: qemu-kvm
Version: 1.0+dfsg-2
Severity: important
Hello,
With recent qemu-kvm versions (don't know since when) network speed
slows down from 2.6 Mbps to less than 300 kbps with GNU/Linux as host
and GNU/Hurd as guest, using the -vnc :n
severity 667604 normal
thanks
On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 13:55 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 05.04.2012 13:25, Svante Signell wrote:
Package: qemu-kvm
Version: 1.0+dfsg-2
Severity: important
...
It appears to be yet another... strange bugreport - there were a few
bugreports recently which
tags 667604 + confirmed upstream fixed-upstream
thanks
On 05.04.2012 15:51, Svante Signell wrote:
severity 667604 normal
thanks
Thank you! ;)
Can you at least give me exact steps to reproduce the issue?
Without -vnc:
kvm -m 1024 -net nic,model=rtl8139 -net user,hostfwd=tcp::5556-:22
On 05.04.2012 16:04, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
Aha. So it is slirp networking (-net user). There's a bug in this
area indeed, which is a missing timer wakeup which can be mitigated
by enabling SDL display or adding some activity. I'll see if it
can be backported.
Note the bug only
On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 16:52 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 05.04.2012 16:04, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
Aha. So it is slirp networking (-net user). There's a bug in this
area indeed, which is a missing timer wakeup which can be mitigated
by enabling SDL display or adding some activity.
On 05.04.2012 17:43, Svante Signell wrote:
Thanks, can you create an x86_64 version. That's the box(es) I'm using.
The i386 version fails to install.
Heh. That's why reportbug script includes some system
information. I didn't find any info about your system
so I created a binary for the same
On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 17:56 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 05.04.2012 17:43, Svante Signell wrote:
Thanks, can you create an x86_64 version. That's the box(es) I'm using.
The i386 version fails to install.
Heh. That's why reportbug script includes some system
information. I didn't
10 matches
Mail list logo
