Hi Axel,
On 7/2/2012 10:41 AM, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Thanks. Any preference who'll prod the release team for the freeze
> exception? :-)
No, I don't :)
I don't mind you do it after the reschedule, else I can do it tomorrow.
Regards,
Reinier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ
Hi Reinier,
Reinier Haasjes wrote:
> On 7/1/2012 1:08 AM, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Please tell me if I should delay it longer.
>
> Looks good, you do not have to delay it longer, you may even reschedule
> to 0-day if you want.
Ok, will do this evening.
> Also merged on git.
Thanks. Any preferen
Hi Axel,
On 7/1/2012 1:08 AM, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Please tell me if I should delay it longer.
Looks good, you do not have to delay it longer, you may even reschedule
to 0-day if you want.
Also merged on git.
Thanks,
Reinier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debia
Do I see right, there is a problem with dpkg-buildpackage?
Or is the problem in debian/rules?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 667755 + pending
tag 670971 + pending
kthxbye
Hi,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> I'm currently preparing an NMU to fix this issue. (Will also include
> the Danish debconf templates from http://bugs.debian.org/670971.)
NMU uploaded to DELAYED/6 and pushed to
https://github.com/xtaran/aiccu
Please tel
tag 667755 - unreproducible + patch
kthxbye
Hi again,
> Lars Duesing wrote:
> > I tried to have a look after this bug, but it won't show up in a
> > newly installed VM here. See attached log.
>
> Same here. Tried to build it in pbuilder on kfreebsd-i386, and it
> worked like a charm(*), even wit
tag 667755 + unreproducible - patch
kthxbye
Hi,
Lars Duesing wrote:
> I tried to have a look after this bug, but it won't show up in a
> newly installed VM here. See attached log.
Same here. Tried to build it in pbuilder on kfreebsd-i386, and it
worked like a charm(*), even with --twice.
(*) Af
Sorry, patch was reversed. Have attached the correct one.
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--- aiccu-20070115.orig/debian/rules 2012-03-26 12:14:04.0 +0100
+++ aiccu-20070115/debian/rules 2012-05-16 13:53:11.856107989 +0100
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
%:
dh $@
-build: $(QUILT_STAMPFN)
tags 667755 + patch
thanks
Hi,
The attached patch seems to make debian/rules work as intended.
I also added the '-f' option to an 'rm' which would otherwise fail on
subsequent rebuilds.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--- aiccu-20070115/debian/rules 2012-05-16 13:53:11.856107
Hi,
Builds okay for me too on Wheezy kfreebsd-i386 (gcc-4.7, kkh 9.0-1)
using dpkg-buildpackage...
But I noticed this in the buildd log, during a debian/rules clean step:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=aiccu&arch=kfreebsd-i386&ver=20070115-15&stamp=1333022804
> Removing patch 04_
Package: src:aiccu
Version: 20070115-15
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi!
Your package failed to build on the kfreebsd
11 matches
Mail list logo
