Package: git-review Version: 1.15-1 Severity: minor Judging from the package description, as well as the description of the "python" section, this package doesn't really belong there (<http://packages.debian.org/unstable/>):
Everything about Python, an interpreted, interactive object oriented language. The mismatch becomes even more blatant when considering the Section description displayed in aptitude: Packages in the 'python' section provide the Python programming language and many third-party libraries for it. Unless you are a Python programmer, you don't need to install packages from this section explicitly; the package system will install them if they are required. So, the implementation language should (IMO) not influence the packages' Section, unless the package really is intended to extend the development environment for that language (libraries, debuggers, code analyzers, ...). I guess a better Section for "git-review" would be "vcs". Note that this whole judgment is made from the package name and description; if "git-review" indeed provides Python libraries for external use, this should be made clear in the package description (and would warrant another (additional) package name anyway). Regards, Rotty -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_AT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
