Bug#670090: Please ship the /sys directory

2012-05-17 Thread Michael Biebl
On 18.05.2012 03:35, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 02:56:26AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Since /sys is shipped by base-files now, we no longer need to add this >> directory to systemd. >> >> For wheezy we will keep the initscripts dependency and in wheezy+1 we >> can rely on ba

Bug#670090: Please ship the /sys directory

2012-05-17 Thread Josh Triplett
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 02:56:26AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Since /sys is shipped by base-files now, we no longer need to add this > directory to systemd. > > For wheezy we will keep the initscripts dependency and in wheezy+1 we > can rely on base-file shipping the directory, so we don't need

Bug#670090: Please ship the /sys directory

2012-04-23 Thread Michael Biebl
On 22.04.2012 22:41, Josh Triplett wrote: > initscripts anymore. In preparation for that, please ship the /sys > directory in systemd, to ensure that it exists as a mountpoint. Right now we still depend on initscripts for the /run-migration bits. So earliest we could drop that depencency post-whe

Bug#670090: Please ship the /sys directory

2012-04-22 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: systemd Version: 44-1 Severity: normal Currently, only initscripts ships the /sys directory. However, systemd mounts /sys itself without relying on initscripts to do so, and systemd has almost reached the point where it won't need to depend on initscripts anymore. In preparation for tha