On Fr, 11 Mai 2012, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> 'le-nl' is '<=' with a special case for the empty version "" to be later
> than anything (for 'le'/'<=' it's earlier than anything, even '~', see
> dpkg(1))
Ugg, true. Learned something new. Was glimpsing at the dpkg manual and
saw only:
On 2012-05-11 03:49, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> use 'le-nl' unless you want to run this on initial install ($2=""), too
>
> le-nl isn't that << ?
'le-nl' is '<=' with a special case for the empty version "" to be later
than anything (for 'le'/'<=' it's earlier than anything, even '~', see
dpkg(1)
On Fr, 11 Mai 2012, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: ptex-bin;
> Maintainer for ptex-bin is Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) ;
> Source for ptex-bin is src:texlive-lang.
Maybe a mixture of stable and unstable ... no idea.
> BTS bug? Still considers the old maintainer as current?
Yes, seems to be. I wa
On Friday, 11. May 2012 01:21:10 Norbert Preining wrote:
> btw, why on earth did this bug not reach the debian-tex-maint ML
> as the current maintainer of ptex-bin? It was reported against
> Package: ptex-bin
> Version: 2011.20120424-1
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6
Hi Andreas,
On Fr, 11 Mai 2012, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> preinst is probably too early to remove the diversions (the old package is
> still installed so both orig_file (the version from ptex-bin) and
> diverted_file (from whatever package) could exist in the file system.
> But postinst should b
Hi Norbert,
[don't forget to Cc: the -submitter]
On Friday, 11. May 2012 01:21:10 Norbert Preining wrote:
> I have made the following additions to the preinst of ptex-bin:
preinst is probably too early to remove the diversions (the old package is
still installed so both orig_file (the version f
Kohda-san,
thanks for your quick answer.
On Fr, 11 Mai 2012, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > rm -f /etc/texmf/texmf.d/30ptex*
> > rm -f /etc/texmf/fmt.d/30ptex*
> > rm -f /etc/texmf/texmf.d/20ptex*
> > rm -f /etc/texmf/fmt.d/20ptex*
>
> Please don't remove 20ptex* because 20ptexjtex.cn
Hi Norbert and all,
On Fri, 11 May 2012 08:21:10 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> I have made the following additions to the preinst of ptex-bin:
> case "$1" in
> install|upgrade)
> if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" le "2011.20120509-1" ; then
> rm -f /etc/texmf/texmf.d/30ptex*
> rm -f /e
Hi Andreas, hi all,
btw, why on earth did this bug not reach the debian-tex-maint ML
as the current maintainer of ptex-bin? It was reported against
Package: ptex-bin
Version: 2011.20120424-1
Anyway. Yes it is true, we have to remove the diversion and other
stuff by the old ptex-bi
9 matches
Mail list logo
