El 02/05/12 00:01, Adam D. Barratt escribió:
After a little bit of research, the mighty archive.org has old copies of
the code, albeit not in a revision-controlled format. The earliest
version recorded there is from April 2004 and assuming I'm reading its
read_urgencies method correctly already
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 23:41 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Tue, 1 May 2012, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> > Adam D. Barratt (01/05/2012):
> > > It's been that way for at least four years; I suspect a good deal
> > > longer but don't have the evidence immediately available. The start
> > > of the
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 23:41:59 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Anyway, I'm afraid you guys are now so used to the new behaviour that
> there is no room for debate here, which is sad, so I'll stop here.
>
It's nothing new, it's about as old as the existence of testing itself.
Cheers,
Julien
sig
On Tue, 1 May 2012, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt (01/05/2012):
> > It's been that way for at least four years; I suspect a good deal
> > longer but don't have the evidence immediately available. The start
> > of the release team's britney1 repository, when we took over direct
> > run
On Tue, 1 May 2012, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > However, if urgencies accumulate, how are we supposed to really mean
> > > "10 days" after an upload not of low priority? It's impossible!
>
> No. The idea is that if you specify urgency=medium that *this* *change* (not
> upload!) should go into test
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 07:10:20PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Santiago Vila writes:
> > I see that diffutils_1:3.2-6, which was uploaded with urgency=low,
> > will only need 5 days to enter testing, probably because I made
> > 1:3.2-4 to be urgency=medium. I don't know when you changed the
>
On 01.05.2012 18:23, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Ansgar Burchardt (01/05/2012):
Santiago Vila writes:
> I see that diffutils_1:3.2-6, which was uploaded with urgency=low,
> will only need 5 days to enter testing, probably because I made
> 1:3.2-4 to be urgency=medium. I don't know when you changed
Ansgar Burchardt (01/05/2012):
> Santiago Vila writes:
> > I see that diffutils_1:3.2-6, which was uploaded with urgency=low,
> > will only need 5 days to enter testing, probably because I made
> > 1:3.2-4 to be urgency=medium. I don't know when you changed the
> > algorithm but I think it is a b
reassign 671066 release.debian.org
thanks
Santiago Vila writes:
> I see that diffutils_1:3.2-6, which was uploaded with urgency=low,
> will only need 5 days to enter testing, probably because I made
> 1:3.2-4 to be urgency=medium. I don't know when you changed the
> algorithm but I think it is a
Package: ftp.debian.org
I see that diffutils_1:3.2-6, which was uploaded with urgency=low,
will only need 5 days to enter testing, probably because I made
1:3.2-4 to be urgency=medium. I don't know when you changed the
algorithm but I think it is a bad change.
In this case, the reason to modify t
10 matches
Mail list logo
