> we don't break existing setups and we
> provide additional functionality.
Yes, it should be fine to adjust the compile time defaults,
to avoid config file handling, and to require to set as few options
as possible explicitly in the default config in debian and in the
installations.
Thanks agai
Good run! :)
Really, thank you for your consideration.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> samba package settings to diverge from upstream defaults
I understand that the usershares option was already a deviation from
the upstream default, to enable usershares. The public share options
might just have been forgotten at that time.
BTW for ad-hock shares II prefer public shares, beca
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 05:13:41PM +0200, email@arcor.de wrote:
> The default samba configuration in debian allows regular users to
> create shares with "net usershare" and its (filemanager) GUI frontends.
> (as of #443230)
> However, users are not able to make their shares public.
> (e.g. na
Quoting email@arcor.de (email@arcor.de):
> As the system shares defined in the default config have explicit
> "guest ok = no" lines, it looks to me that it should not produce a problem to
> add these settings to the default global section, or define them at compile
> time.
>
> Neverthe
5 matches
Mail list logo
