> Just noticed that the issue is stuill there in TL 2014.
That is unfortunately the case as nobody has come up with a bugfix.
The problem turned out to be really intricate and would in my opinion
need changes in fontspec to fix. I'm happy to listen to any suggestion.
Arthur
--
To UN
found 672742 2014.20140528.34243-5
stop
On 28.05.13 Arthur Reutenauer (arthur.reutena...@normalesup.org) wrote:
Hi,
> About the Polyglossia bug: I still don't know exactly what's
> happening, but I am now reasonably convinced that it happens within
> Polyglossia's code (even though it's provoked
Hi Arthur,
On Di, 28 Mai 2013, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
> About the Polyglossia bug: I still don't know exactly what's
> happening, but I am now reasonably convinced that it happens within
> Polyglossia's code (even though it's provoked by issuing fontspec
> commands), and that defining \cyrilli
Hello again,
About the Polyglossia bug: I still don't know exactly what's
happening, but I am now reasonably convinced that it happens within
Polyglossia's code (even though it's provoked by issuing fontspec
commands), and that defining \cyrillicfont will reliably work around the
problem
Thank you, Norbert, for reminding me. Unfortunately I have no idea
what's happening here, and I don't know how to fix this. I inherited
many bugs from François, and I'm still working on some of them (this one
being amongst the most complicated ones).
Best,
Arthur
--
-
>
> > From: Kirill Smelkov
> > Subject: Bug#672742: /usr/bin/xetex: xetex fails to compile documents with
> > defaultfontfeatures set
> > To: Debian Bug Tracking System
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> > X-Mailer: re
On 19.06.12, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 09:24:44PM +0200, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > On 16.06.12, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
I did some experimenting with the minimal example: it seems like an
incompatibility between polyglossia and fontspec that only manifests
itself in case of lang
Hi Arthur, Norbert,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 08:00:06AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Arthur,
>
> On So, 13 Mai 2012, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
> > I see that, I'm going to look into it as soon as possible. We still
> > have until 24 May to update packages for 2011, right?
>
> Thanks. Wel
Hi Norbert,
I see that, I'm going to look into it as soon as possible. We still
have until 24 May to update packages for 2011, right?
Arthur
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li
Hi Arthur,
On So, 13 Mai 2012, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
> I see that, I'm going to look into it as soon as possible. We still
> have until 24 May to update packages for 2011, right?
Thanks. Well, when it is fixd it is fixed, we have tlnet updates
afterwards, too, so no need to force anything.
Here another instance and analysis sent my a bug reported on Debian.
- Forwarded message from Kirill Smelkov -
> From: Kirill Smelkov
> Subject: Bug#672742: /usr/bin/xetex: xetex fails to compile documents with
> defaultfontfeatures set
> To: Debian Bug Tracking Syst
Package: texlive-binaries
Version: 2011.20120510-1
Severity: important
File: /usr/bin/xetex
Dear Maintainer,
After recent update of texlive, xetex fails to compile all my documents.
I've tracked the problem to the following minimal example:
8< (xetex-bug.tex)
\documentclass[12pt]{artic
12 matches
Mail list logo
