Bug#672820: transition: libcdio

2012-06-30 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 23:45:52 +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear release team, I'd like to upload a recent libcdio to unstable. Unfortunately, as usual with libcdio,

Bug#672820: transition: libcdio

2012-06-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 00:15:30 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: As you (Julien) discovered, mednafen has a potential FTBFS related to its construction of Built-Using (#677867). Given that the current package binNMU'd correctly on all platforms except hurd-i386, I suppose I should wait until the

Bug#672820: transition: libcdio

2012-06-18 Thread Stephen Kitt
Hi, On Mon, 14 May 2012 01:00:40 +0200, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 00:30:10 +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote: ¹ I somehow missed the requirement to request transitions as bug reports against the release.debian.org pseudo-package, and asked it about 2

Bug#672820: transition: libcdio

2012-06-14 Thread Nicolas Boullis
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:08:48PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: Thanks for your patience. It should be fine to go ahead now. #676100 will need to be fixed, but that may just mean dropping the libxmmsclient-ruby* packages. Ok, thanks. I just uploaded libcdio 0.83-4 to unstable. Cheers, --

Bug#672820: transition: libcdio

2012-06-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 23:45:52 +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote: Please tell me whether/when I can upload to unstable. Thanks for your patience. It should be fine to go ahead now. #676100 will need to be fixed, but that may just mean dropping the libxmmsclient-ruby* packages. Cheers, Julien

Bug#672820: transition: libcdio

2012-05-13 Thread Nicolas Boullis
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear release team, I'd like to upload a recent libcdio to unstable. Unfortunately, as usual with libcdio, upgrading from 0.81 to 0.83 means breaking the ABI and changing the sonames of

Bug#672820: transition: libcdio

2012-05-13 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Boullis nboul...@debian.org (13/05/2012): A binNMU should be enough for all these packages. does it mean the API didn't change much, and that you test-rebuilt those packages? Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#672820: transition: libcdio

2012-05-13 Thread Nicolas Boullis
Hi KiBi, On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:19:57AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Hi Nicolas, does it mean the API didn't change much, That's true. and that you test-rebuilt those packages? Unfortunately not. I test-rebuilt vcdimager (which lead me to patching libcdio to revert a change in its

Bug#672820: transition: libcdio

2012-05-13 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi Nicolas, On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 00:30:10 +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote: ¹ I somehow missed the requirement to request transitions as bug reports against the release.debian.org pseudo-package, and asked it about 2 months ago as a simple e-mail to debian-release@l.d.o, but my message

Bug#672820: transition: libcdio

2012-05-13 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi again, Nicolas Boullis nboul...@debian.org (13/05/2012): If I understand what a ben file is, I think a ben file for this transition could be: title = libcdio; is_affected = .depends ~ /libcdio-cdda[01]/ | .depends ~ /libcdio-paranoia[01]/ | .depends ~ /libcdio1[03]/ | .depends ~