On Sat, 02 Jun 2012, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
> [Whoops, missed this reply, it wasn't threaded properly.]
> On 02/06/12 20:26, Bart Martens wrote:
> > Please remove the part "(closes: #674844)" from debian/changelog. Bug
> > 674844
> > is for version 2.2.2-1 in stable. That bug in stable is not
[Whoops, missed this reply, it wasn't threaded properly.]
On 02/06/12 20:26, Bart Martens wrote:
> Please remove the part "(closes: #674844)" from debian/changelog. Bug 674844
> is for version 2.2.2-1 in stable. That bug in stable is not solved by
> uploading version 2.2.5-1 to unstable. Please
On 02/06/12 20:08, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote:
> And why is your rfs "important" there are no critical or security related
> updates. ?
It closes #674844. That looks serious to me.
> In your changelog you evan say urgency=low
The package is changing sections, hence it will have to enter NEW.
retitle 673096 RFS: figlet/2.2.5-1
severity 673096 normal
stop
Hi Jonathan,
Please remove the part "(closes: #674844)" from debian/changelog. Bug 674844
is for version 2.2.2-1 in stable. That bug in stable is not solved by
uploading version 2.2.5-1 to unstable. Please keep 674844 open until 67
5
Aan: 673...@bugs.debian.org
CC: ba...@debian.org; clavi...@debian.org; ans...@debian.org
Onderwerp: Bug#673096: RFS: figlet/2.2.5-1 [RC]
Hi all,
I've packaged figlet 2.2.5-1 [1] and uploaded it to mentors.d.n [2].
Thanks,
Jon
[1]
figlet (2.2.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release. (
Hi all,
I've packaged figlet 2.2.5-1 [1] and uploaded it to mentors.d.n [2].
Thanks,
Jon
[1]
figlet (2.2.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release. (closes: #674844) (closes: #617422) (closes: #150174)
- figlet has been relicensed as BSD. All undistributable files have either
6 matches
Mail list logo
