On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 02:49:35 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
That would be a reason not to package xfonts-100dpi at all, right?
It'll probably die eventually, yes.
I was using xmessage and xlsfonts to debug. The actual affected
program was xvile. I can imagine users running into this
severity 673170 wishlist
reassign 673170 xfs 1:1.0.8-7
tags 673170 + upstream
quit
Julien Cristau wrote:
One way to fix it would be to have X / xfs watch its fontpath with
inotify or similar and automatically refresh things. Nobody cares
enough about core fonts to implement that.
Thanks.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 16:06:44 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi Julien,
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:59:01 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Trying to address http://bugs.debian.org/563250 (xvile appearance
wrong due to missing font), I installed xfonts-100dpi.
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 16:06:44 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:59:01 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Trying to address http://bugs.debian.org/563250 (xvile appearance
wrong due to missing font), I installed xfonts-100dpi.
Hi Julien,
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:59:01 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Trying to address http://bugs.debian.org/563250 (xvile appearance
wrong due to missing font), I installed xfonts-100dpi. Alas:
$ xmessage -fn lucidasans-10 It was the best of times
Package: xfonts-utils
Version: 1:7.7~1
Files: /usr/sbin/update-fonts-dir
Hi,
Trying to address http://bugs.debian.org/563250 (xvile appearance
wrong due to missing font), I installed xfonts-100dpi. Alas:
$ xmessage -fn lucidasans-10 It was the best of times
Warning: Cannot
6 matches
Mail list logo
