Hi Dmitrij,
First of all thank you for picking up the maintenance of this package.
It is non-trivial.
On 01/06/12 01:57, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
Hi Dmitrijs,
I'd like to thank you for your care for the 'autofs' package
but please excuse me for expressing my non-appreciation of your NMU.
I
Hi Dmitrijs,
First of all thank you for picking up the maintenance of this package.
It is non-trivial.
:)
I'd like to thank you for your care for the 'autofs' package
but please excuse me for expressing my non-appreciation of your NMU.
I have cancelled it due to bug that Jakub Wilk
tags 674391 + patch
tags 674391 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for autofs (versioned as 5.0.6-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru autofs-5.0.6/debian/changelog autofs-5.0.6/debian/changelog
---
* Dmitrijs Ledkovs dmitrij.led...@ubuntu.com, 2012-05-31, 16:12:
- dh $@
+ dh $@ --with autotools-dev,autoreconf
dh_autoreconf is a superset of the autotools-dev debhelper addons, so
you do not need --with=autotools_dev if you use --with=autoreconf. In
fact, in most cases they
On 31/05/12 23:34, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Dmitrijs Ledkovs dmitrij.led...@ubuntu.com, 2012-05-31, 16:12:
-dh $@
+dh $@ --with autotools-dev,autoreconf
dh_autoreconf is a superset of the autotools-dev debhelper addons, so
you do not need --with=autotools_dev if you use
* Dmitrijs Ledkovs x...@debian.org, 2012-05-31, 23:58:
-dh $@
+dh $@ --with autotools-dev,autoreconf
dh_autoreconf is a superset of the autotools-dev debhelper addons, so
you do not need --with=autotools_dev if you use --with=autoreconf. In
fact, in most cases they should not be used
Hi Dmitrijs,
I'd like to thank you for your care for the 'autofs' package
but please excuse me for expressing my non-appreciation of your NMU.
Although perhaps not fast enough we're working on 'autofs' - we have a
team of three and a different fix to the problem is already committed
to
7 matches
Mail list logo
