Marking this bug as "fixed" is incorrect for this case because the issue remains, and will mean that when someone else finds the bug they will reopen it -- which is the correct thing for them to do.
If this the remaining parts of this bug are "not considered bugs", or if the intention is not to fix these bugs because they were created by a necessary design choice (of removing CELT), then I think the right thing to do is to give a reasonable explanation that a potential bug reporter can understand, and to mark the bug "wontfix". That way when others run into the problem and find the bug report, they'll learn that the package has this issue by design. If the bug is marked "fixed" rather than "wontfix" then I intend to reopen it, by the same reasoning. Thanks. -- Chris -- Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
