Bug#677046: Bug#628493: perl: FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386: t/op/threads failed

2013-09-10 Thread Petr Salinger
If I remember correctly, the perl code expects something which is not guaranteed by POSIX. But our new implementation provides this, therefore we (kfreebsd) are not affected by this any longer. Indeed, although at one time you argued that it was a correctness fix anyway. We seem to have a

Bug#677046: Bug#628493: perl: FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386: t/op/threads failed

2013-09-09 Thread Petr Salinger
IMO, my suggested change (Perl_atfork_reinit) in Message #54 [1] still should be aplied by perl upstream. While it might not be problem for this testcase, the unlocking in forked child is fragile. Hi, I finally (!) got round to submitting this upstream, at [1], and the comment so far is that

Bug#677046: Bug#628493: perl: FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386: t/op/threads failed

2013-09-07 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 07:03:57AM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: Hi! I just bisected on past eglibc versions and this is reproducible for me (segfault 5% of the time) on kfreebsd-i386, up until this version, with which I can't reproduce the problem any more (10,000+ test runs) : eglibc