Bug#686054: [monkeysphere] Bug#682518: Bug#677565: RC bugs in msva-perl

2013-02-19 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 + pending On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 02:03:48PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 02/08/2013 04:14 AM, intrigeri wrote: > > > I'm going to test it during a few days. > > thank you very much, intrigeri! > > > Looks like a good plan, but I suggest waiting a bit longer for: > >

Bug#682353: Bug#686054: [monkeysphere] Bug#682518: Bug#677565: RC bugs in msva-perl

2013-02-15 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote (08 Feb 2013 19:03:48 GMT) : > now that i have a volunteer other than myself to test it, i will wait > until i hear back from you :) I've been using the proposed msva-perl's integration into the SSH client for a week and have not experienced any regression. > meanwh

Bug#677565: [monkeysphere] Bug#682518: Bug#677565: RC bugs in msva-perl

2013-02-08 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 02/08/2013 04:14 AM, intrigeri wrote: > I'm going to test it during a few days. thank you very much, intrigeri! > Looks like a good plan, but I suggest waiting a bit longer for: > > 1. You and someone else (I volunteer) to try the proposed package > for a few days: given t-p-u uploads

Bug#677565: [monkeysphere] Bug#682518: Bug#677565: RC bugs in msva-perl

2013-02-08 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote (08 Feb 2013 05:48:55 GMT) : > I've just pushed a proposed upstream msva-perl/0.8.1 targetted bugfix > tag to git://lair.fifthhorseman.net/~dkg/msva-perl, and a "wheezy" > branch that uses that and targets testing-proposed-updates. Excellent! Thanks a lot. > I've te

Bug#677565: Bug#682518: Bug#677565: RC bugs in msva-perl

2013-02-07 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 02/04/2013 01:28 PM, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 03:31:33PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: >> FWIW, I've asked about the same on the Monkeysphere mailing-list last >> October, see dkg's answer there: >> https://lists.riseup.net/www/arc/monkeysphere/2012-10/ I've just pushed a p

Bug#677565: RC bugs in msva-perl

2013-02-04 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 03:31:33PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > Dominic Hargreaves wrote (02 Feb 2013 13:19:21 GMT) : > > As the release team aren't too happy about the size of the 0.9 debdiff, > > what do you think about my suggestion - are these the right commits > > to fix the RC bugs in q

Bug#677565: RC bugs in msva-perl

2013-02-02 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Dominic Hargreaves wrote (02 Feb 2013 13:19:21 GMT) : > As the release team aren't too happy about the size of the 0.9 debdiff, > what do you think about my suggestion - are these the right commits > to fix the RC bugs in question (one of them needs rebasing/porting; the > other appears to be

Bug#677565: RC bugs in msva-perl

2013-02-02 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 01:12:16PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > These three RC bugs are still present in wheezy although they were > fixed in sid in July. > > Am I right in thinking that #682518 and #677565 are actually the > same issue, and that they are fixed by upstream co

Bug#677565: RC bugs in msva-perl

2013-02-02 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
Hi Daniel, These three RC bugs are still present in wheezy although they were fixed in sid in July. Am I right in thinking that #682518 and #677565 are actually the same issue, and that they are fixed by upstream commits? 7f8a57a1ebc8f5b4d63acbd8f7104c85f7dc0a19 Make msva's primary listening da