On 22.09.2012 15:04, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2012-09-22 12:08, Matthias Klose wrote:
I don't want this in gcc-4.7. Please provide a patch for gcc-defaults. This
should work as well.
That won't work, just tried it. The only package from gcc-defaults that
could be involved in the
On 2012-09-23 14:32, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 22.09.2012 15:04, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2012-09-22 12:08, Matthias Klose wrote:
I don't want this in gcc-4.7. Please provide a patch for gcc-defaults. This
should work as well.
That won't work, just tried it. The only package from
reassign 677582 gcc-4.7-base 4.7.2-2
reopen 677582
thanks
On 2012-09-21 14:22, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
[...]
I'm now trying to add these Breaks to gcc-4.7-base, that can't be held
back, hopefully.
Attached is a diff that finally fixes this upgrade issue, hopefully.
gcc-4.7-base isn't that
I don't want this in gcc-4.7. Please provide a patch for gcc-defaults. This
should work as well.
On 22.09.2012 09:23, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
reassign 677582 gcc-4.7-base 4.7.2-2
reopen 677582
thanks
On 2012-09-21 14:22, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
[...]
I'm now trying to add these Breaks to
On 2012-09-22 12:08, Matthias Klose wrote:
I don't want this in gcc-4.7. Please provide a patch for gcc-defaults. This
should work as well.
That won't work, just tried it. The only package from gcc-defaults that
could be involved in the problematic upgrade paths is gcj-jre-headless
and that
5 matches
Mail list logo
