Dear maintainer, is this some sort of poor joke, or what is going on
here? After the latest update to 1.5.6-1, installing wine-unstable
results in installing two dummy, empty and absolutely useless packages
on amd64.
$ dpkg -L wine{,64-bin}-unstable
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Jakub Moc rote:
Dear maintainer, is this some sort of poor joke, or what is going on
here?
No.
After the latest update to 1.5.6-1, installing wine-unstable
results in installing two dummy, empty and absolutely useless packages
on amd64.
$ dpkg -L
2012/6/28 Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org:
Try typing wine.
We could probably be better at being informative with a NEWS entry,
but its not really at the top of my list of things to do. I would
certainly be willing to apply an appropriate patch for that.
Best wishes,
Mike
Well, the
That's because it's i386-only and wine-unstable:amd64 should install
wine-bin-unstable:i386 (well, when i386 arch is enabled manually). Feel
free to open a bug asking to document all of that because it's confusing
indeed.
I am sorry, this is not confusing, this is simply mispackaged. The
Package: wine-unstable
Version: 1.1.36-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The original upload of wine-unstable for amd64 seems to be missing all packages.
The original acceptance mail [1] does not list them neither in the list of build
packages nor in the accepted
5 matches
Mail list logo
