Package: zlib1g
Version: 1:1.2.7.dfsg-11
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Recent binNMU of zlib1g on amd64 made it impossible to co-install it in a
multi-arch environment.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable')
A
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 08:13:06PM +0200, Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
> Recent binNMU of zlib1g on amd64 made it impossible to co-install it in a
> multi-arch environment.
What makes you say this, and why are you filing a bug on the package?
Please provide a description of whatever problem you think yo
Hi,
Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 08:13:06PM +0200, Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
>> Recent binNMU of zlib1g on amd64 made it impossible to co-install it in a
>> multi-arch environment.
>
> What makes you say this, and why are you filing a bug on the package?
> Please provide a description
2012/6/19 Mark Brown :
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 08:13:06PM +0200, Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
>
>> Recent binNMU of zlib1g on amd64 made it impossible to co-install it in a
>> multi-arch environment.
>
> What makes you say this, and why are you filing a bug on the package?
> Please provide a description
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 13:36 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> He's probably asking you to work around [1] by making a sourceful
> upload at some time before the next release.
>
> Doing that every time there is a binnmu sounds like a lot of work and
[...]
It's not "every time there is a binnmu", it'
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 07:44:58PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 13:36 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > [1] After a binnmu, the version numbers and changelogs don't match
> > so dpkg refuses to install a package for both architectures at the
> > same time. https://lists.de
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:00:21AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Though looking at why this was done it's not clear to me why we're not
> doing this particular round of uploads for all arches...
Because with the current buildd architecture you cannot get equal changelogs
across all architectures, eve
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:00:21AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Though looking at why this was done it's not clear to me why we're not
> doing this particular round of uploads for all arches...
I didn't get what you pointed at, but it was me who scheduled it. You
built the package with an old versio
Package: zlib1g
Followup-For: Bug #678172
Hello,
this should be fixed as soon as possible through a re-upload as the
current state makes wine in unstable un-installable:
root@unstable:~# apt-get install wine-bin:i386 libwine:i386
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Read
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:36:08PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:
> > What makes you say this, and why are you filing a bug on the package?
> > Please provide a description of whatever problem you think you are
> > seeing and contact the release team (who are responsible for bin
10 matches
Mail list logo
