On 22/06/12 15:04, intrigeri wrote:
> Dererk wrote (22 Jun 2012 17:01:05 GMT) :
>> Since this very very simple "typo" throws the Vidalia enduser
>> a totally harmless but error-message-at-the-end[2], I thought I was
>> better to avoid the user get confused about any possible issue on
>> Vidalia, in
Dererk wrote (22 Jun 2012 17:01:05 GMT) :
> Since this very very simple "typo" throws the Vidalia enduser
> a totally harmless but error-message-at-the-end[2], I thought I was
> better to avoid the user get confused about any possible issue on
> Vidalia, in contrast to depending on an extra single
On 22/06/12 13:28, intrig...@debian.org wrote:
> Package: vidalia
> Version: 0.2.19-1
> Severity: serious
>
> vidalia now Depends: apparmor, although the latter package is not
> needed for Vidalia to provide a significant amount of functionality.
> I believe this is a violation of the Debian Policy
Package: vidalia
Version: 0.2.19-1
Severity: serious
vidalia now Depends: apparmor, although the latter package is not
needed for Vidalia to provide a significant amount of functionality.
I believe this is a violation of the Debian Policy.
In general, packages that ship an AppArmor profile Sugges
4 matches
Mail list logo
