On sön, 2012-07-01 at 01:56 +, Steve Singer wrote:
The problem is that slony 2.0.x (slon) opens up serializable
transactions that caues the conflicts. This can happen even if user
applications only perform repeatable read transactions. The
transactions will be retried after they are
On tor, 2012-06-28 at 19:02 -0400, Steve Singer wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On mån, 2012-06-25 at 16:00 -0400, Steve Singer wrote:
In terms of Debian releases, stable contains slony built for 8.4, so
shipping slony for 9.1 that does not work with serializable
No, I meant that stable has slony for 8.4, and testing (the next stable)
has slony for 9.1, which means someone upgrading from stable to the next
stable won't experience a regression, except that they will need to make
sure they use the repeatable read isolation level.
Testing is
On mån, 2012-06-25 at 16:00 -0400, Steve Singer wrote:
The Slony bug shows that a fix to 2.0 was also committed, so it would be
better to wait for a release of that. Debian testing is frozen, so no
new major upstream releases will be accepted for a while.
The fix had to be reverted from
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On mån, 2012-06-25 at 16:00 -0400, Steve Singer wrote:
In terms of Debian releases, stable contains slony built for 8.4, so
shipping slony for 9.1 that does not work with serializable transactions
is not a regression (at least with this bug
Package: postgresql-9.1-slony1-2
Version: 2.0.7-4
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Slony 2.0.7 does not support/work well with Postgresql 9.1
Slony 2.1.1 does include support for Postgresql 9.1
See Upstream Slony bug #255
On mån, 2012-06-25 at 09:48 -0400, Steve Singer wrote:
Slony 2.0.7 does not support/work well with Postgresql 9.1
Slony 2.1.1 does include support for Postgresql 9.1
See Upstream Slony bug #255
http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255
That says it has some issues with
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On mån, 2012-06-25 at 09:48 -0400, Steve Singer wrote:
Slony 2.0.7 does not support/work well with Postgresql 9.1
Slony 2.1.1 does include support for Postgresql 9.1
See Upstream Slony bug #255
http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255
8 matches
Mail list logo
