Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA]

hi, On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Bart Martens wrote: >> (adding also DMUA): >> - DM-Upload-Allowed. > > Did you agree that with someone who is going to sponsor this ? No. That is simply my intent, means "I want to add DMUA: yes", and I hope it would also reviewed to be or not to be. In

Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA]

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 08:25:56PM +0900, Satoru KURASHIKI wrote: > (adding also DMUA): > - DM-Upload-Allowed. Did you agree that with someone who is going to sponsor this ? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsu

Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA]

hi, Thank you for reviewing this package! On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Bart Martens wrote: > I found this in debian/copyright : > > Source: branch from http://launchpad.net/bzr-email and hand-packed > by "tar cf - | gzip -9". > > That's not really "detailed information". I figured

Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA]

Hi KURASHIKI Satoru, As I commented earlier for your package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-06-28 00:14, detailed information on how the repackaged source was obtained, and on how this can be reproduced should be provided in debian/copyright. http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-referen

Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA] is not-fit-for-wheezy

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 20/07/12 17:14, Satoru KURASHIKI a écrit : > hi, > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Thibaut Paumard > wrote: >> package sponsorship-requests user >> sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org usertags 679344 >> not-fit-for-wheezy > >> Now that

Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA] is not-fit-for-wheezy

hi, On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > package sponsorship-requests > user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org > usertags 679344 not-fit-for-wheezy > Now that the freeze has started, this package is not fit for wheezy. > During freeze, it is generally better to upload

Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA] is not-fit-for-wheezy

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 package sponsorship-requests user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org usertags 679344 not-fit-for-wheezy thanks Hi, Now that the freeze has started, this package is not fit for wheezy. During freeze, it is generally better to upload new upstre

Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA]

hi, On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: > I'm sending this on to the pkg-bazaar list. Would you be interested in > maintaining this as part of that team? Does the team needs some help? Though I'm not a skilled python developer, bzr packaging is important for me to use

Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA]

Hi, I'm sending this on to the pkg-bazaar list. Would you be interested in maintaining this as part of that team? -- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio Ubuntu Developer Debian Maintainer PGP/G

Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bzr-email" * Package name: bzr-email Version : 0.0.1~bzr58-1 Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd * URL : https://launchpad.net/bzr-email * License : GPL-2+