Bug#679356: For users who had base-files 6.8 installed, dpkg considers /etc/profile an (obsolete) conffile

2012-06-30 Thread Santiago Vila
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Josh Triplett wrote: Package: base-files Version: 6.11 Severity: normal base-files 6.8 had /etc/profile as a conffile. Thus, users who had 6.8 installed and subsequently upgraded to a later version will have /etc/profile marked as an obsolete conffile in the dpkg

Bug#679356: For users who had base-files 6.8 installed, dpkg considers /etc/profile an (obsolete) conffile

2012-06-30 Thread Josh Triplett
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 02:57:34PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Josh Triplett wrote: Package: base-files Version: 6.11 Severity: normal base-files 6.8 had /etc/profile as a conffile. Thus, users who had 6.8 installed and subsequently upgraded to a later version

Bug#679356: For users who had base-files 6.8 installed, dpkg considers /etc/profile an (obsolete) conffile

2012-06-28 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: base-files Version: 6.11 Severity: normal base-files 6.8 had /etc/profile as a conffile. Thus, users who had 6.8 installed and subsequently upgraded to a later version will have /etc/profile marked as an obsolete conffile in the dpkg database: ~$ dpkg-query -f '${Conffiles}\n' -W