On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:28:38AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi,
Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
See attached diff against upstream procps version 3.2.8, which is the
version
that, AFAICT, ulatencyd embeds.
Hm. Does upstream have any hints about this?
Nope, he seems a bit inactive
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:28:38AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hm. Does upstream have any hints about this? My first guess would
be that the imported copy of procps was distro-patched.
It looks like it. procps 3.2.8 came out in 2009. The Debian, Fedora
and OpenSuSE fork of procps, which is
Hi,
Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
See attached diff against upstream procps version 3.2.8, which is the version
that, AFAICT, ulatencyd embeds.
Hm. Does upstream have any hints about this? My first guess would
be that the imported copy of procps was distro-patched.
[...]
+++
forwarded 680123 https://github.com/poelzi/ulatencyd/issues/37
tags 680123 + pending
kthxbye
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 02:01:19PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Package: ulatencyd
Version: 0.5.0-7
Severity: minor
Justification: cosmetic
Tags: upstream
Hi,
First, thanks for packaging
Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
ulatencyd embeds a not so up-to-date version of libprocps because it uses some
of its internal symbols, and
Thanks. Which internal symbols? Maybe they could be exposed, or
maybe some other part of the API provides the same functionality.
Hope that helps,
Jonathan
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 08:14:26AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
ulatencyd embeds a not so up-to-date version of libprocps because it uses
some
of its internal symbols, and
Thanks. Which internal symbols? Maybe they could be exposed, or
maybe some other
Package: ulatencyd
Version: 0.5.0-7
Severity: minor
Justification: cosmetic
Tags: upstream
Hi,
First, thanks for packaging ulatencyd. I'm looking forward to finding
more time to play with it.
Every time ulatencyd starts, it prints a warning:
| # sudo service ulatencyd restart
| []
7 matches
Mail list logo
