tag 682068 + patch
thanks
Le Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:46:45 +0200,
Holger Levsen a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Mittwoch, 30. April 2014, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > I'll try to cook something. But if you really want to remove the
> > support, wouldn't it be better to unconditionally switch to the new
> >
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 30. April 2014, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> I'll try to cook something. But if you really want to remove the
> support, wouldn't it be better to unconditionally switch to the new
> path instead?
as said a year ago, just changing pathes won't work, as detecting selinux
needs to b
Le Tue, 7 Jan 2014 13:45:39 +0100,
Holger Levsen a écrit :
> Hi Laurent,
>
> On Dienstag, 7. Januar 2014, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > Any news for this bug?
>
> no.
>
> I also don't have motivation to work on this, so help would be
> welcome. (I'd rather invest time in AppArmor than SELinux
control: tags -1 + help
Hi Laurent,
On Dienstag, 7. Januar 2014, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Any news for this bug?
no.
I also don't have motivation to work on this, so help would be welcome. (I'd
rather invest time in AppArmor than SELinux...)
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Descrip
tags 682068 - moreinfo
thanks
Hi Laurent,
On Sonntag, 19. Mai 2013, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > - /usr/sbin/selinuxenabled doesn't even exist on my wheezy system
>
> This executable is in selinux-utils package.
ah, ok.
> > - isn't there some selinux tool to tell me the expected mountpoint?
5 matches
Mail list logo