On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 03:56:40PM -0400, Matt Barry wrote:
> We can do as suggested above and remove our own (arguably superfluous)
> check, and take the minor performance win.
You have my approval, go ahead if you feel like doing so.
Greetings
Marc
On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 21:54 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 03:00:50PM -0400, Matt Barry wrote:
> > Any objections to either moving this bug to passwd, or just
> > wontfix'ing
> > this?
>
> No objection from me, I'd just reassign the bug. If we can do
> something
> to speed
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 03:00:50PM -0400, Matt Barry wrote:
> Any objections to either moving this bug to passwd, or just wontfix'ing
> this?
No objection from me, I'd just reassign the bug. If we can do something
to speed deletion up while having more pretty code, we should do that
anyway
Hi,
I have added a test to benchmark the deletion of groups on a system
with tens of thousands of users, and it is indeed (still) not great.
However, removing the overhead described in this bug (and replacing it
with *nothing*) only yields < 10-15% speed-up.
I would not be opposed to relying on
4 matches
Mail list logo
