Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de
* Package name: console
Version : 0.0.9
Upstream Author : Sebastian Billaudelle sbillaude...@googlemail.com
* URL : http://cream-project.org
* License : GPL-2+
Programming
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 01:40:48PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
* Package name: console
[...]
Description : Terminal application for the Cream Desktop Environment
Isn't that bit too generic a name?
--
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Jyväskylä, Finland
http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.fi/newblog/
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:40:48 +0200
Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de
* Package name: console
That's too generic. cream-console would be better. Or, to fit in with
other terminal
retitle #682502 ITP: cream-terminal -- Terminal application for the Cream
Desktop Environment
thanks
Hi Neil (et al.)
Am Montag, 23. Juli 2012, 13:58:05 schrieb Neil Williams:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:40:48 +0200
Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity:
Hi again,
On Mo 23 Jul 2012 13:58:05 CEST Neil Williams wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:40:48 +0200
Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de
* Package name: console
That's too generic.
Le lundi, 23 juillet 2012 13.40:48, Mike Gabriel a écrit :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de
* Package name: console
I think console is a far too generic package name for a console. Please
use something like cream-console or
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 02:29:23PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
It would probably make sense to rename the console executable (as
provided by upstream) to cream-terminal then?
Of course (and poke upstream to do that, not just rename it in the
package).
Or will Debian accept an binary with the
7 matches
Mail list logo