On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:11:07PM +0100, Nick Leverton wrote:
> This now reminds me of some investigations I did a few years back into a
> similar issue in inn's nntpget. I found that a small number of clients
> did not trim References headers when they grew past 1024 bytes, or perhaps
> trimmed
retitle 682803 trn4: Segfault whilst applying killfile to article with long
header line
tag 682803 +patch
thanks
This now reminds me of some investigations I did a few years back into a
similar issue in inn's nntpget. I found that a small number of clients
did not trim References headers when th
Package: trn4
Version: 4.0-test77-5
Followup-For: Bug #682803
I should have investigated the article reported in the backtrace.
It has a References header of 1034 characters, and we are trying (at
artsrch.c line 400) to sprintf that into good old 'buf' which is only
1024 bytes long.
I fear this m
3 matches
Mail list logo