Bug#684817: lilypond: FTBFS: (process:29483): Pango-WARNING **: error opening config file '/root/.pangorc': Permission denied

2012-11-24 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Michael Banck wrote: > For the record, I get the segfault on a regular amd64 sbuild run as > well. Ah, awesome. Might be something that is sbuild specific, then. I'll try to get a build up with complete debugging information to see what is happening. Don Armstrong -- Drop

Bug#684817: lilypond: FTBFS: (process:29483): Pango-WARNING **: error opening config file '/root/.pangorc': Permission denied

2012-11-24 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 03:57:10PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 12/09/12 at 09:28 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > Just a note to say that I can still reproduce this. > > > > Can you please provide a backtrace and/or a coredump? [I believe

Bug#684817: lilypond: FTBFS: (process:29483): Pango-WARNING **: error opening config file '/root/.pangorc': Permission denied

2012-09-16 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 12/09/12 at 09:28 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > Just a note to say that I can still reproduce this. > > > > Can you please provide a backtrace and/or a coredump? [I believe that > > the build current

Bug#684817: lilypond: FTBFS: (process:29483): Pango-WARNING **: error opening config file '/root/.pangorc': Permission denied

2012-09-16 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 12/09/12 at 09:28 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Just a note to say that I can still reproduce this. > > Can you please provide a backtrace and/or a coredump? [I believe that > the build currently has them turned on, so it should just be a matter >

Bug#684817: lilypond: FTBFS: (process:29483): Pango-WARNING **: error opening config file '/root/.pangorc': Permission denied

2012-09-12 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Just a note to say that I can still reproduce this. Can you please provide a backtrace and/or a coredump? [I believe that the build currently has them turned on, so it should just be a matter of pulling them out of sbuild.] (Does this happen anywhere el

Bug#684817: lilypond: FTBFS: (process:29483): Pango-WARNING **: error opening config file '/root/.pangorc': Permission denied

2012-09-12 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
severity 684817 serious thanks On 20/08/12 at 12:51 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 18/08/12 at 21:49 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > tag 684817 unreproducible > > retitle 684817 segfault in lilypond > > thanks > > > > > > > > On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > > > During a reb

Bug#684817: lilypond: FTBFS: (process:29483): Pango-WARNING **: error opening config file '/root/.pangorc': Permission denied

2012-08-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 18/08/12 at 21:49 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > tag 684817 unreproducible > retitle 684817 segfault in lilypond > thanks > > > > On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to > > build on amd64. > > I've rebuild this on

Bug#684817: lilypond: FTBFS: (process:29483): Pango-WARNING **: error opening config file '/root/.pangorc': Permission denied

2012-08-18 Thread Don Armstrong
tag 684817 unreproducible retitle 684817 segfault in lilypond thanks On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to > build on amd64. I've rebuild this on wheezy on amd64. The actual error is a segfault in lilypond (or somethin

Bug#684817: lilypond: FTBFS: (process:29483): Pango-WARNING **: error opening config file '/root/.pangorc': Permission denied

2012-08-14 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: lilypond Version: 2.14.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[6]: E