Control: tag -1 pending
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Paul Wise wrote:
> I didn't see the comments from Charles Plessy as I wasn't subscribed to
> the bug and he did not CC me. I've attached a new version adopting his
> suggestions.
Patch applied with some tweaks (suggestion of David and also reformulatio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 16/09/2012 21:16, Paul Wise a écrit :
>
> -Moving, removing, renaming, adopting, and orphaning packages
> +Moving, removing, reintroducing, renaming, adopting, and orphaning
> packages
>
I guess “reintroducing” should be the last item o
Le Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 09:16:32AM +0800, Paul Wise a écrit :
> On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 08:51 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> > Done in the attached patch, thanks.
>
> I didn't see the comments from Charles Plessy as I wasn't subscribed to
> the bug and he did not CC me. I've attached a new version ado
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 08:51 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Done in the attached patch, thanks.
I didn't see the comments from Charles Plessy as I wasn't subscribed to
the bug and he did not CC me. I've attached a new version adopting his
suggestions.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Ind
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 13:28 +, Bart Martens wrote:
> I'm looking at this now. I agree with most of your patch. I'm having doubts
> on this paragraph :
...
> I suggest to replace the paragraph quoted above by these two paragraphs :
Done in the attached patch, thanks.
Based on feedback from
Le Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 08:38:51PM +0800, Paul Wise a écrit :
>
> Apparently I need an ack on my patch to devref about the procedures
> needed when re-introducing packages. I would appreciate it if someone
> from the debian-qa list (CCed) could take a look at the patch and
> suggest if the patch n
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 08:38:51PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 19:53 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> > My patch does not seem to have been committed to the SVN repository,
> > could someone do that please?
>
> Apparently I need an ack on my patch to devref about the procedures
> n
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 19:53 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> My patch does not seem to have been committed to the SVN repository,
> could someone do that please?
Apparently I need an ack on my patch to devref about the procedures
needed when re-introducing packages. I would appreciate it if someone
from
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 11:43 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I changed the sentence to make it clear that this is only triggered by
> removals from unstable. Updated patch attached.
My patch does not seem to have been committed to the SVN repository,
could someone do that please?
--
bye,
pabs
http://
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 18:35 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> Perhaps there should be a note making clear that only removal from unstable
> (and experimental) is what is meant here; removals from testing do not give
> cause to use this procedure.
I changed the sentence to make it clear that
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 08:42:45AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> +You should check why the package was removed in the first place. This
> +information can be found in the removal item in the news section of the PTS
> +page for the package or by browsing the log of
> +http://&ftp-master-host;/removals.h
Dear Paul,
I think it is good idea to add this section, thank you. I have two comments.
> +It may be appropriate to contact the former maintainers to find out if
> +they are working on reintroducing the package, interested in co-maintaining
> +the package or interested in sponsoring the package
Package: developers-reference
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
How to reintroduce packages isn't fully obvious to everybody and there
some details that rely on services or information some folks don't know
about. I have written a section for devref with the information I know
about. Please apply the
13 matches
Mail list logo
