Bug#685268: Your isc-dhcp 4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+wheezy1 upload

2012-09-17 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Raphael Geissert wrote: Hi, I'm rejecting your isc-dhcp upload to the security archive for the following reasons: * Uploads must be coordinated and ACKed by the security team. Unless I'm missing something, it didn't happen this way. * Incorrect version

Bug#686174: Bug#685268: Your isc-dhcp 4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+wheezy1 upload

2012-09-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2012-09-15 at 16:22 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Raphael Geissert wrote: * Incorrect version numbering. For Wheezy the +debNuX schema will be used. [...] It would be nice if that were corrected. Also devref could use some correction as well since it

Bug#685268: Your isc-dhcp 4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+wheezy1 upload

2012-09-15 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hi again, On Friday 14 September 2012 18:46:48 Raphael Geissert wrote: * Uploads must be coordinated and ACKed by the security team. Unless I'm missing something, it didn't happen this way. I've been pointed out that you talked to Nico about it. Please accept my apologies. Kind regards, --

Bug#686174: Bug#685268: Your isc-dhcp 4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+wheezy1 upload

2012-09-15 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Raphael Geissert wrote: * Incorrect version numbering. For Wheezy the +debNuX schema will be used. I wasn't aware that this was the new rule. I was using the following, which seemed like it had already been updated for wheezy

Bug#685268: Your isc-dhcp 4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+wheezy1 upload

2012-09-14 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hi, I'm rejecting your isc-dhcp upload to the security archive for the following reasons: * Uploads must be coordinated and ACKed by the security team. Unless I'm missing something, it didn't happen this way. * Incorrect version numbering. For Wheezy the +debNuX schema will be used. * The