On Wednesday 05 September 2012 11:17 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 September 2012 11:13 PM, Peter Gervai wrote:
>> > Upstart works and requires the patch, but as far as I see it's not
>> > really upstarty: it closely emulates sysvinit and doesn't do neither
>> > event driven runs n
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 11:13 PM, Peter Gervai wrote:
> Upstart works and requires the patch, but as far as I see it's not
> really upstarty: it closely emulates sysvinit and doesn't do neither
> event driven runs nor parallel processing, so no surprise here.
>
> For systemd I have to pull u
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 September 2012 06:44 PM, Peter Gervai wrote:
>> Interesting; popcon says systemd 600+ installed while systemd-sysv is
>> around 70; this is versus upstart 250 installs. I'll try to check
>> them.
> I guess most are still pa
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 06:44 PM, Peter Gervai wrote:
> Interesting; popcon says systemd 600+ installed while systemd-sysv is
> around 70; this is versus upstart 250 installs. I'll try to check
> them.
I guess most are still passing it as the kernel argument and exploring
it. No one wants a
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 September 2012 01:23 AM, grin wrote:
>> Which init do you particularly have in mind? I can install anything on my
>> test
>> VMs until I send them to oblivion. :-) [I'll check them though.]
> systemd seems to have the most
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 01:23 AM, grin wrote:
> Which init do you particularly have in mind? I can install anything on my test
> VMs until I send them to oblivion. :-) [I'll check them though.]
systemd seems to have the most interest right now.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 22:33:58 +0530
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> The patch looks okay to me. But I am not sure which way we want to go. A
> better approach could be to use a udev rule. Also someone needs to test
> this scenario with the newer event based init daemons.
Mine was a quick and dirty hac
On Monday 03 September 2012 10:32 PM, Peter Gervai wrote:
> My devices reside on multiple hosts using all kinds of troublesome parameters
> (drbd, slow links, virtualised machines, etc)
> which results 2-3 seconds between iscsi login and the devices recognised by
> the kernel. open-iscsi start sc
Package: open-iscsi
Version: 2.0.873-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch
My devices reside on multiple hosts using all kinds of troublesome parameters
(drbd, slow links, virtualised machines, etc)
which results 2-3 seconds between iscsi login and the devices recognised by the
kernel. open-iscsi st
9 matches
Mail list logo
