Gentlemen,
thank you for investigating such twisted issue!
When building in parallel, sometime librhash.a was created prior to
librhash.so and rhash_shared binary.
The command 'mv rhash_shared rhash' preserved timestamp.
Then wrong static 'rhash' binary was re-built by command 'make test' (as
requ
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 05:31:55PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 05:13:57PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > Ok, NMU cancelled until this is sorted out ...
>
> For the record, I tried a build of Gregor's NMU patch using sbuild and
> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=4 on bot
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 05:13:57PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 21:43:30 +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> > > I've prepared an NMU for rhash (versioned as 1.2.9-7.1) and
> > > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> > > should delay it longer.
>
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 21:43:30 +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > I've prepared an NMU for rhash (versioned as 1.2.9-7.1) and
> > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> > should delay it longer.
> `make -C librhash test` still builds the static rhash binary which btw is not
>
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 03:37:18PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> tags 687398 + pending
> thanks
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for rhash (versioned as 1.2.9-7.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
`make -C librhash test` st
tags 687398 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for rhash (versioned as 1.2.9-7.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
: :' : Debian
6 matches
Mail list logo
