Bug#687620: RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-1 [ITP]

2012-12-12 Thread Alex Z
Hi, Helmut! It's me again. Almost all notices you mentioned below are fixed. At least, now we have manpages. :-) But i have some difficulties with hardening. I cleanly see, that all required flags gets used during build process, for example: cc -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -DUDPXREC_MOD -DNDEBUG

Bug#687620: RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-1 [ITP]

2012-12-12 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:50:49PM +1100, Alex Z wrote: Hi, Helmut! It's me again. Almost all notices you mentioned below are fixed. At least, now we have manpages. :-) But i have some difficulties with hardening. I cleanly see, that all required flags gets used during build process, for

Bug#687620: RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-1 [ITP]

2012-12-12 Thread Alex Z
Peter Pentchev писал 2012-12-12 23:43: On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:50:49PM +1100, Alex Z wrote: The linking line that you pasted above is the one used to create the udpxy executable file, while Lintian complains about a file named udpxrec. Is udpxrec a separate program? If so, you should look

Bug#687620: RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-1 [ITP]

2012-12-12 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:50:49PM +1100, Alex Z wrote: Almost all notices you mentioned below are fixed. At least, now we have manpages. :-) Ok. Let me have a look below. for linking. But lintian says, that udpxy: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/udpxrec. Can it be false-positive?

Bug#687620: RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-1 [ITP]

2012-12-12 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 03:27:31PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:50:49PM +1100, Alex Z wrote: Almost all notices you mentioned below are fixed. At least, now we have manpages. :-) Ok. Let me have a look below. for linking. But lintian says, that udpxy:

Bug#687620: RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-1 [ITP]

2012-12-12 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:00:33AM +1100, Alex Z wrote: Peter Pentchev писал 2012-12-12 23:43: On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:50:49PM +1100, Alex Z wrote: The linking line that you pasted above is the one used to create the udpxy executable file, while Lintian complains about a file named

Bug#687620: RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-1 [ITP]

2012-12-12 Thread Pavel Cherenkov
Let me add in a few bits here: At least half-way answered. Just when do I need multicast? Multicast is needed for the application to function properly, but not to start or run (idly). A client submits an HTTP request (via an arbitrary HTTP client, a browser, wget or any other app) and gets a

Bug#687620: RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-1 [ITP]

2012-10-25 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:22:46PM +1100, Alex 'AdUser' Z wrote: WNPP request are here : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687543 Package uploaded just now : https://mentors.debian.net/package/udpxy So I had a look at your package version 1.0.23-1 as found on

Bug#687620: RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-1 [ITP]

2012-09-14 Thread Alex 'AdUser' Z
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear Mentors, I'm looking for sponsor for package 'udpxy' -- a UDP-to-HTTP multicast traffic relay daemon. Main purpose of this package - allow use of multicasted stream behind NAT, without configuring igmp forwarding on router. WNPP request