Bug#688299: libpolyorb3: using diversions in M-A: same packages is a bad idea

2012-10-11 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: libpolyorb3 Followup-For: Bug #688299 Control: found -1 2.8~20110207-5 Hi Xavier, you are missing maintainer script code to remove the diversion created by the package currently in testing. What was previously done in postrm should now be done in the postinst, you may restrict it to

Bug#688299: libpolyorb3: using diversions in M-A: same packages is a bad idea

2012-10-11 Thread Xavier Grave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Andreas, Thanks a lot for taking time to look at my try to fix #688299. I'll really need to understand better the difference between postinst and postrm. xavier Le 11/10/2012 10:30, Andreas Beckmann a écrit : Package: libpolyorb3 Followup-For:

Bug#688299: Fwd: Bug#688299: libpolyorb3: using diversions in M-A: same packages is a bad idea

2012-09-24 Thread Xavier Grave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks Ludovic and Nicolas, I will remove the manpage from libpolyorb3. Does my DM status enough in order to ask for a freeze exception ? Then when the bug is fixed in wheezy I'll try to sort out if we need this manpage or the documentation is enough

Bug#688299: Fwd: Bug#688299: libpolyorb3: using diversions in M-A: same packages is a bad idea

2012-09-22 Thread Nicolas Boulenguez
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:45:32AM +0200, Xavier Grave wrote: As far as I remember the Breaks/Replace libpolyorb2 by libpolyorb3 isn't an option ? Imagine exe2 is linked to libpolyorb2 exe3 is linked to libpolyorb3 Breaks/Replace would unexpectedly make those executables not coinstallable. I

Bug#688299: Fwd: Bug#688299: libpolyorb3: using diversions in M-A: same packages is a bad idea

2012-09-22 Thread Ludovic Brenta
From its content, the polyorb the manpage has nothing to do in libpolyorb[soversion]: /usr/share/man From its content, I would advice libpolyorb-doc: /usr/share/man or, easyer to find: libpolyorb-doc: /usr/share/doc/libpolyorb-doc Since - there is a single man page in libpolyorb3, namely

Bug#688299: libpolyorb3: using diversions in M-A: same packages is a bad idea

2012-09-21 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: libpolyorb3 Version: 2.8~20110207-4 Severity: normal Hi, using diversions in M-A: same packages seems to be a bad idea. I expect the following sequence to fail (but can't test it currently because gnat-4.6-base is not yet M-A co-installable). have the ancient libpolyorb2 installed

Bug#688299: Fwd: Bug#688299: libpolyorb3: using diversions in M-A: same packages is a bad idea

2012-09-21 Thread Xavier Grave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'd like to your advices about this bug in order to solve it. As far as I remember the Breaks/Replace libpolyorb2 by libpolyorb3 isn't an option ? xavier - Message original Sujet: Bug#688299: libpolyorb3: using diversions in