On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 18:34:50 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-09-29 at 04:27pm, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-09-29 at 09:55 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > nmu asterisk-flite_2.1-1 . ALL . -m "Re-link against newer asterisk
> > > (that has broken shlibs file)."
> >
> > I
On 12-09-29 at 04:27pm, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-09-29 at 09:55 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > nmu asterisk-flite_2.1-1 . ALL . -m "Re-link against newer asterisk
> > (that has broken shlibs file)."
>
> I assume the point is actually that the new asterisk has a /fixed/
> shlibs fi
On Sat, 2012-09-29 at 09:55 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> nmu asterisk-flite_2.1-1 . ALL . -m "Re-link against newer asterisk
> (that has broken shlibs file)."
I assume the point is actually that the new asterisk has a /fixed/
shlibs file?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu asterisk-flite_2.1-1 . ALL . -m "Re-link against newer asterisk (that has
broken shlibs file)."
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (5
4 matches
Mail list logo