* Guido Günther:
>> Why is spice only available for amd64 and i386 in the first place? I
>> have a vague recollection about x86-only assembly language snippets
>> that reeked of micro-optimization -- is that still the problem?
>
> Yes, for locking primitives I think, Lets better ask the maintainer
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:17:53PM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> * Guido Günther:
>
> >> Well, what about this then:
> >>
> >> Subject: [PATCH] spice is only available on i386 and amd64
> >>
> >> so don't depend on it on other architectures
> >
> > ...won't work since it's arch all - sorry for th
* Guido Günther:
>> Well, what about this then:
>>
>> Subject: [PATCH] spice is only available on i386 and amd64
>>
>> so don't depend on it on other architectures
>
> ...won't work since it's arch all - sorry for the noise. We'll use the
> recommends then.
> Cheers,
> -- Guido
Why is spice on
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:16:37AM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 06:30:09PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 10:44:08PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 01:18:39PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > > > Would it be feasibl
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 06:30:09PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 10:44:08PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 01:18:39PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > > Would it be feasible to upload this fix to wheezy-proposed-updates, since
> > > the
> > >
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 10:44:08PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 01:18:39PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > Would it be feasible to upload this fix to wheezy-proposed-updates, since
> > the
> > package is uninstallable on non-x86 arches? Is it a simple change in the
> >
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 01:18:39PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Would it be feasible to upload this fix to wheezy-proposed-updates, since the
> package is uninstallable on non-x86 arches? Is it a simple change in the
> Depends/Recommends, or does it require code changes that would be too invas
Would it be feasible to upload this fix to wheezy-proposed-updates, since the
package is uninstallable on non-x86 arches? Is it a simple change in the
Depends/Recommends, or does it require code changes that would be too invasive
for wheezy?
Thanks for maintaining virt-manager!
live well,
vagra
Package: virt-manager
Version: 0.9.1-4
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
I have virt-manager working here perfectly fine on kfreebsd-amd64
after removing the hard dependency on python-spice-client-gtk which is
uninstallable on architecutres other than linux-{amd64,i386}. Would be
cool to relax the depende
9 matches
Mail list logo
