On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:08:09PM +0100, Samuel Hym wrote:
> Due to the bug report, apt-listbugs blocked the upgrade of procps
> but not of libprocps0, which provoked an equally messy result.
> (I'm somewhat assuming that the “affects” command would be enough
I probably should of reported it on th
affects 691847 + libprocps0
thanks
Due to the bug report, apt-listbugs blocked the upgrade of procps but
not of libprocps0, which provoked an equally messy result.
(I'm somewhat assuming that the “affects” command would be enough for
apt-listbugs to avoid the upgrading in such a case, but I'm n
2 matches
Mail list logo
