On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 11:23:21AM +0100, Stefan Cornelius wrote:
> It looks to me like the patch provided by you in [1] to fix Debian bug
> #692076 [2] is reversed. I'm not sure if that's by intention or not,
> so I thought I'd just give you a quick heads-up.
Thanks - catdoc-bad-for-loop.patch is indeed accidentally reversed -
just a slip on my part in generating the patch, but it's probably worth
explicitly pointing out on the ticket in case people look quickly and
think they have the fix applied already (so cc-ing).
(Also noted by Nick Bane).
Cheers,
Olly
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
