Hi,
On 11/11/2012 04:22 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 07:29:16PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
>> Good news from upstream:
>>
>> "This is not a problem -- I will remove the JSON code from Jmol. It's
>> just used for the Molecular Playground, and it isn't necessary there
>> anywa
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 07:29:16PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> Good news from upstream:
>
> "This is not a problem -- I will remove the JSON code from Jmol. It's
> just used for the Molecular Playground, and it isn't necessary there
> anyway."
They released a new version and I backpatched
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:56:57PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> The upstream tarball contains files under the non-free JSON license:
Good news from upstream:
"This is not a problem -- I will remove the JSON code from Jmol. It's
just used for the Molecular Playground, and it isn't necessa
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:56:57PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Package: jmol
> Version: 12.2.32+dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
>
> The upstream tarball contains files under the non-free JSON license:
Thanks for letting us know, we will take a look.
Best regards,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCR
Package: jmol
Version: 12.2.32+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
The upstream tarball contains files under the non-free JSON license:
% rgrep -l 'The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil.' .
./debian/copyright
./src/com/json/CDL.java
./src/com/json/JSONStringer.java
./src/com/json/XMLTokener.java
./s
5 matches
Mail list logo