Le vendredi, 28 décembre 2012 19.39:33, Moritz Mühlenhoff a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 06:40:29PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Le jeudi, 27 décembre 2012 20.43:12, Moritz Mühlenhoff a écrit :
AFAICS can there haven't been any regressions, can we should go ahead
with the update
Le jeudi, 27 décembre 2012 20.43:12, Moritz Mühlenhoff a écrit :
AFAICS can there haven't been any regressions, can we should go ahead with
the update now.
EPARSE
Didier, can you upload to security-master, please?
The release targetted to Wheezy has just been reviewed in #695423, I'll upload
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 06:40:29PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Le jeudi, 27 décembre 2012 20.43:12, Moritz Mühlenhoff a écrit :
AFAICS can there haven't been any regressions, can we should go ahead with
the update now.
EPARSE
I meant: No regressions in sid - We can proceed with
On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 11:32:57AM +0100, Didier Raboud wrote:
Le samedi, 8 décembre 2012 09.12:20, Yves-Alexis Perez a écrit :
On sam., 2012-12-08 at 01:58 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
I propose to get CVE-2012-5519 (#692791) fixed with the attached debdiff.
To be honest,
On sam., 2012-12-08 at 01:58 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Hi dear security team,
I propose to get CVE-2012-5519 (#692791) fixed with the attached debdiff.
It is a backport of the patches discussed on the upstream bug [#4223] for
cups
1.4.4, plus the needed packaging changes to
Le samedi, 8 décembre 2012 09.12:20, Yves-Alexis Perez a écrit :
On sam., 2012-12-08 at 01:58 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
I propose to get CVE-2012-5519 (#692791) fixed with the attached debdiff.
To be honest, considering how invasive the patch is, I'd like it to stay
a bit in
On sam., 2012-12-08 at 11:32 +0100, Didier Raboud wrote:
Le samedi, 8 décembre 2012 09.12:20, Yves-Alexis Perez a écrit :
On sam., 2012-12-08 at 01:58 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
I propose to get CVE-2012-5519 (#692791) fixed with the attached debdiff.
To be honest,
Le samedi, 8 décembre 2012 12.26:05, Yves-Alexis Perez a écrit :
That said, who triggers the re-examination of the patch for security
release?
What do you mean?
I'd like it to stay a bit in unstable
#define a bit ?
I was just wondering about who would decide when it would be the good
On sam., 2012-12-08 at 13:43 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Le samedi, 8 décembre 2012 12.26:05, Yves-Alexis Perez a écrit :
That said, who triggers the re-examination of the patch for
security
release?
What do you mean?
I'd like it to stay a bit in unstable
#define a bit ?
9 matches
Mail list logo