Control: reopen -1
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 11:45:08AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 04:20:40 +
From: Bart Martens ba...@quantz.debian.org
To: 694872-d...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing RFS: lftp/4.3.8-1.1 [NMU] [RC]
Package lftp has been
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 12:59:44PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 11:45:08AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 04:20:40 +
From: Bart Martens ba...@quantz.debian.org
To: 694872-d...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing RFS: lftp/4.3.8-1.1
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:08:24 +, Bart Martens wrote:
lftp hasn't been uploaded or removed, so this bug shouldn't be closed. It
might be a problem is some script, because mentors has 2 versions of lftp: a
version for sid, and a version for testing-proposed-updates.
However, are you sure
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 06:23:47PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:08:24 +, Bart Martens wrote:
Thanks for your reply (and thanks gregor for the upload).
lftp hasn't been uploaded or removed, so this bug shouldn't be closed. It
might be a problem is some
Well, I thought this was only the case when there is no other option, because
the version has to be smaller than the one in unstable (when testing has
4.3.6-1 and unstable has 4.3.6-2 with unacceptable changes). I did a t-p-u
update like this (without the deb7u suffix) yesterday (for fossil),
Hi Mike,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 03:20:25PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Well, I thought this was only the case when there is no other option,
because
the version has to be smaller than the one in unstable (when testing has
4.3.6-1 and unstable has 4.3.6-2 with unacceptable changes). I
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Ivo De Decker wrote:
Hi Mike,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 03:20:25PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Well, I thought this was only the case when there is no other option,
because
the version has to be smaller than the one in unstable (when testing has
4.3.6-1
Mike,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 04:36:23PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Yes. I don't have a link to the final decision, but you can easily
verify the veracity of that statement by looking at the versioning of
packages that have gone through tpu recently (e.g. cdbs, underscore,
etc.).
Sure,
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Ivo De Decker wrote:
Mike,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 04:36:23PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Yes. I don't have a link to the final decision, but you can easily
verify the veracity of that statement by looking at the versioning of
packages that have gone
9 matches
Mail list logo
