Bug#696075: lcl-utils: directory vs. symlink mess after squeeze => wheezy upgrade: /etc/lazarus

2013-01-03 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2013-01-03 14:00, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 18:40 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: >> I don't think it was a symlink in squezze after comparing the >> packages; my suspect at the moment is update-alternatives in >> debian/lcl-utils.postinst.in. > /etc/lazarus is a now an alter

Bug#696075: lcl-utils: directory vs. symlink mess after squeeze => wheezy upgrade: /etc/lazarus

2013-01-03 Thread Abou Al Montacir
On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 18:40 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 15:35:37 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > > during an upgrade test with piuparts I noticed your package installs > > files over an existing symlink, overwriting files from another package > > in a way that is not det

Bug#696075: lcl-utils: directory vs. symlink mess after squeeze => wheezy upgrade: /etc/lazarus

2012-12-31 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 15:35:37 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > during an upgrade test with piuparts I noticed your package installs > files over an existing symlink, overwriting files from another package > in a way that is not detected by dpkg: > > 0m44.0s INFO: dirname part contains a symlink: >

Bug#696075: lcl-utils: directory vs. symlink mess after squeeze => wheezy upgrade: /etc/lazarus

2012-12-16 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: lcl-utils Version: 0.9.30.4-1.1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during an upgrade test with piuparts I noticed your package installs files over an existing symlink, overwriting files from another package in a way that is not detected by dpkg: 0m