Bug#696332: lsb-release: release/codename depend on a successful apt-get

2021-05-18 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 18 May 2021, Benjamin Drung wrote: > In case /usr/lib/os-release sets VERSION_CODENAME or > /etc/debian_version specifies only one codename, lsb-release takes the > information from there. base-files 11 don't set these values (and > therefore trigger this bug), but base-files 11.1 does

Bug#696332: lsb-release: release/codename depend on a successful apt-get

2021-05-18 Thread Benjamin Drung
Hi, I ran into this issue with salt. salt failed to determine its codename grain after a fresh boot. In case /usr/lib/os-release sets VERSION_CODENAME or /etc/debian_version specifies only one codename, lsb-release takes the information from there. base-files 11 don't set these values (and

Bug#696332: lsb-release: release/codename depend on a successful apt-get

2016-08-03 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi again, Axel Beckert wrote: > > How does your /etc/debian_version look like ? And what is the output > > of `apt-cache policy` ? > > → cat /etc/debian_version > stretch/sid > → apt-cache policy > E: Problem renaming the file /var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin.JkcuIW to > /var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin -

Bug#696332: lsb-release: release/codename depend on a successful apt-get

2016-08-03 Thread Axel Beckert
Control: found -1 9.20160629 Hi Didier, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > If an apt-get update fails (i.e. no internet connection), the lsb > > codename will change to "n/a", which shouldn't happen. Release changes > > to "testing/unstable". I just ran into this on a uptodate Debian Sid system,

Bug#696332: lsb-release: release/codename depend on a successful apt-get

2013-06-01 Thread Teodor MICU
Control: block 685355 by 696332 2013/5/21 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org: Even if your log confirms that, I can't reproduce this behaviour on jessie. I cant test on „jessie/testing” but this affects at least unattended-upgrades on „wheezy/stable”. See bug #685355 for details. Cheers --

Bug#696332: lsb-release: release/codename depend on a successful apt-get

2013-05-21 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Hi varacanero, and thanks for your bugreport, Le mercredi, 19 décembre 2012 18.20:27, varacanero a écrit : Subject: lsb-release: release/codename depend on a successful apt-get update Package: lsb-release Version: 4.1+Debian8 Severity: normal If an apt-get

Bug#696332: lsb-release: release/codename depend on a successful apt-get

2012-12-19 Thread varacanero
Subject: lsb-release: release/codename depend on a successful apt-get update Package: lsb-release Version: 4.1+Debian8 Severity: normal If an apt-get update fails (i.e. no internet connection), the lsb codename will change to n/a, which shouldn't happen. Release changes to testing/unstable.