Bug#696556: ldd_load_address.diff

2013-07-20 Thread Robert Millan
2013/7/20 Petr Salinger : >> 111_ldd_load_address.diff changes kernel-user ABI. How mergeable is this? > > It is not ABI chabge, it is only a change of > implementation defined behaviour. Seems like a moot point. The whole ABI is implementation-defined ;-) > I do not know details of upstream tool

Bug#696556: ldd_load_address.diff

2013-07-20 Thread Petr Salinger
111_ldd_load_address.diff changes kernel-user ABI. How mergeable is this? It is not ABI chabge, it is only a change of implementation defined behaviour. Is FreeBSD also affected in some way? The testcase is reproducible when built using their toolchain/libc, but not when using their ldd. I'm